Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://patrimoinenumeriqueafricain.com:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2470
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAmin, Samir
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-31T11:51:09Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-12T07:21:52Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-31T11:51:09Z
dc.date.available2020-07-12T07:21:52Z-
dc.date.issued2009-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://patrimoinenumeriqueafricain.com:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2470-
dc.description.abstractOur Ecological Footprint by Mathis Wackernagel and William Rees (1996) instigated a major strand in radical social thinking about construction of the future. The authors not only defined a new concept — that of an ecological footprint — they also developed a metric for it, whose units are defined in terms of "global hectares," comparing the biological capacity of societies/countries (their ability to produce and reproduce the conditions for life on the planet) with their consumption of resources made available to them by this bio-capacity. The authors' conclusions are worrying. This article can also be found at the Monthly Review website, where most recent articles are published in full. Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the Monthly Review website.fr-FR
dc.language.isoenfr-FR
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMonthly review;
dc.subjectecologyfr-FR
dc.subjectvulgar economicsfr-FR
dc.titleThe ecological footprint and unsustainable developmentfr-FR
Appears in Collections:Archives Samir-Amin

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Ecology MR nov 2009.pdf379.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.